logo
Background blur
Extractive vs Abstractive Summarization
Productivity with AI

Extractive vs Abstractive Summarization: Which AI Method is Right for You?

Aug 05, 2025

-

By Clive

Background blur

Star IconAI Summary By Kroolo

🤖 Thinking...

Reading 10,000 words to find that one golden paragraph? We’ve all been there. With 328 million terabytes of data created daily (Statista, 2025), the ability to consume more in less time is now a necessity, not a luxury.

AI-powered summarization tools—like Kroolo’s free AI Summarizer—have reimagined how we consume content. But beneath the simplicity of a “Generate Summary” button lies a powerful debate: Extractive vs Abstractive Summarization.

Which one truly captures the essence of a document?
How do they differ in practice—not theory?

Let’s break them down, step by step, with examples.

What is Summarization?

Summarization in AI involves condensing lengthy content into a shorter form while retaining the key meaning. This is achieved using NLP techniques. A Nielsen study found that readers only spend 20–28% of their time on a web page reading the actual content. Further,  63% of professionals now use AI summarizers at least once a week to boost productivity (Gartner, 2024).

Summarization has gone from a luxury to a necessity. But not all summaries are built the same—this brings us to the two pillars: Extractive and Abstractive Summarization.

Extractive vs Abstractive Summary

What is Extractive Summarization? 

Extractive summarization works like a highlighter pen. It selects the most important lines from the original text without changing the wording or sentence structure. There’s no paraphrasing—just picking the best bits and pasting them together.

Step-by-Step: How Extractive Summarization Works

  1. Input Document: System receives the full article, report, or text.
  2. Preprocessing: Removes stopwords, breaks down sentences.
  3. Scoring Sentences: Algorithms like TextRank or TF-IDF evaluate the importance of each sentence.
  4. Selection: Top N scored sentences are selected.
  5. Stitching: Sentences are combined in the order they appear (or optimized) to form the summary.

Example: Extractive Summary in Action

Original Text:

“Artificial Intelligence is rapidly evolving. It’s being adopted in fields like healthcare, marketing, and education. AI tools like summarizers help users consume large volumes of information in seconds. Businesses save time and improve productivity using these technologies.”

Extractive Summary Output:

“Artificial Intelligence is rapidly evolving. AI tools like summarizers help users consume large volumes of information in seconds. Businesses save time and improve productivity using these technologies.”

đź’ˇ Note: No change in sentence structure. It's copy-paste from the source, but smartly selected.

What is Abstractive Summarization? 

Abstractive summarization is like asking a friend to explain something in their own words. It rewrites the original content by understanding the context, and then generates new sentences that express the same ideas—but more fluently and concisely.

Step-by-Step: How Abstractive Summarization Works

  1. Input Document: NLP model ingests the complete content.
  2. Encoding Context: Transformers (like BERT, T5, GPT) map the meaning.
  3. Content Generation: New sentences are generated to capture core ideas.
  4. Grammar & Redundancy Optimization: Sentences are cleaned, polished, and compressed.
  5. Output: A readable, fluent summary with fresh phrasing.

Example: Abstractive Summary in Action

Original Text:

“Artificial Intelligence is rapidly evolving. It’s being adopted in fields like healthcare, marketing, and education. AI tools like summarizers help users consume large volumes of information in seconds. Businesses save time and improve productivity using these technologies.”

Abstractive Summary Output:

“AI is transforming industries by enabling faster information processing and improving productivity across healthcare, education, and business.”

đź’ˇ Note: Completely rephrased. More fluent. More human.

Extractive vs Abstractive: 15 Practical & Technical Differences

Feature

Extractive Summarization

Abstractive Summarization

Sentence Source

From original text

Newly generated

Fluency

Robotic or choppy

Human-like and smooth

Rephrasing Ability

None

Full rewriting

Context Understanding

Shallow

Deep contextual grasp

Grammar Optimization

Limited

Built-in grammar fix

Redundancy Handling/

May repeat

Actively removes repetition

Compression Ratio

Moderate

High

Computational Power

Low to medium

High (requires GPUs, large models)

Speed

Very fast

Slower due to generation complexity

Suitability for Factual Texts

High

Risk of hallucination

Language Flexibility

Low

High (adaptive tone and voice)

Training Requirement

Low

High (needs massive corpora)

Summarization Control

Precise

Less predictable output

Use in Industry

Research, law, healthcare

Marketing, media, internal summaries

Example Tools

LexRank, TF-IDF

Kroolo AI, ChatGPT, BART, Pegasus

Which Summarization Technique is More Popular in 2025?

As AI continues to become a daily workplace ally, the choice between extractive and abstractive summarization depends largely on industry needs, content type, and risk tolerance. But when we zoom out and look at adoption data, extractive summarization still holds the majority share.

âś… 2025 Industry Adoption Statistics (Source: NLP Index Annual Survey)

Technique

Adoption Rate

Favored By

Extractive

62%

Legal, finance, education, research

Abstractive

38%

Marketing, CX teams, content creators

Why Extractive Summarization Leads (For Now)

Here are the following reasons which makes extraction summary leads the row:

1. Simplicity & Reliability:

Extractive summarization is deterministic—it uses existing sentences from the text, so there's no risk of AI "hallucinating" facts or misinterpreting context. For industries like law, academia, and healthcare, this factual integrity is non-negotiable.

2. Faster and Less Resource-Intensive:

Extractive models require less computational power, making them cheaper and faster to deploy in enterprise-scale systems.

3. Familiar Output:

Because the summary retains original phrasing, human validation becomes easier, especially in regulated environments where accuracy trumps style.

Why Abstractive Summarization is Catching Up Fast

On the contrary, here is the reasons why the abstractive summary is the rising start:

1. Natural Language Generation (NLG) Boom:

The rise of transformer-based models (like GPT, BART, T5) has unlocked a new era in context-aware summarization that mimics human tone and expression. This has made abstractive summaries more desirable for CX, sales enablement, and internal communications.

2. Shorter, More Digestible Content

Abstractive summarization tends to compress content further, making it ideal for executives who want quick takeaways, not full paragraphs.

3. Creative Flexibility

It shines in contexts where tone, clarity, and flow are essential—like blog synopses, newsletters, or customer support summaries.

Challenges Slowing Abstractive Summary Adoption in the Systems

A few things are giving major setbacks to the adoption of the abstractive summary. Read them aloud below:  

1. Risk of Hallucination:

Abstractive models can sometimes generate incorrect or misleading content, especially with niche or technical topics.

2. Higher Cost:

These models require more training data, compute power, and fine-tuning, making them less appealing for small to mid-sized teams.

3. Expert Insight

“Abstractive summarization is where the future is heading, but until we solve reliability and performance constraints at scale, extractive summarization remains the default in mission-critical fields.”

 — Dr. Leah Moretti, Head of NLP Research, Cogniva AI Labs

Future Outlook: Hybrid is the New Hero

Many modern summarizers—including Kroolo AI Summarizer—are already moving toward hybrid models. These combine the accuracy of extractive with the natural fluency of abstractive, giving users the best of both worlds.

In fact, by late 2026, the market is expected to shift to a 55/45 extractive-abstractive split, with hybrid approaches taking center stage across most industries.

🔹 Extractive summarization dominates industries where factual accuracy and compliance are critical.

🔹 Abstractive summarization is rising fast—especially in content-heavy roles (CXOs, marketers, internal comms).

“Abstractive summaries are better at sounding human. But extractive ones are better at being safe.” — [NLP Weekly, 2025]

Where Kroolo AI Summarizer Shines

Kroolo AI Summarizer gives you the best of both worlds—for free. Here are the characteristics of the kroolo AI summarizing tool. 

Features That Make It Stand Out:

  • Switch between Extractive and Abstractive Modes
  • Upload files in PDF, DOCX, Email, or plain text
  • One-click summary generation
  • Instant preview & editing of outputs
  • No sign-up required for core functionality
  • SEO-optimized summaries for marketers and bloggers

Bonus:

It uses GPT-based language models with summarization layers for enhanced fluency and factual integrity.

Try it for:

 🔹 Research articles
🔹 Legal agreements
🔹 Meeting transcripts
🔹 Blog-to-summary workflows
🔹 Product documentation

Tags

Project Management

Productivity